Proposals to change
the California Environmental Quality Act
Proposals to spur more housing by changing the 1970s-era
California Environmental Quality Act
• AB648, by Assemblyman Dave
Jones, D-Sacramento: Makes cities considering development projects
subject to CEQA analysis identify the eventual owner or user of the
project.
• AB1387, by Jones: Allows
housing projects proposed in downtown or central city neighborhoods
to be approved without analyzing traffic impacts if they comply with
traffic and transportation policies in the city's zoning and growth
plans.
• SB427, by Sen. Dennis
Hollingsworth, R-La Mesa: Exempts new freeway overpasses, on-ramps
and off-ramps proposed on existing Caltrans property from undergoing
an environmental analysis.
• SB785, by Sen. Tom
McClintock, R-Northridge: Requires groups that use the environmental
quality act to sue development projects to list all people,
associations, partnerships or corporations involved and their
financial interest in the controversy or other interest that could
be affected by the outcome.
• SB832, by Sen. Don Perata,
D-Oakland: Greatly expands areas of central city development exempt
from CEQA requirements. Would include projects under 10 acres with
fewer than 300 homes in cities with more than 200,000 residents.
• SB948, by Sen. Kevin Murray,
D-Culver City: Allows home builders to prepare a short-form
environmental impact report rather than expensive full-blown report
for residential projects inside cities or unincorporated areas
already planned and zoned for houses. Cites the state's housing
shortage and need to remove regulatory barriers.
• Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger:
Working on draft legislation that says developers who build homes on
land already planned and zoned for housing -- and analyzed earlier
for environmental effects -- would not have to do more analyses for
impacts. It would also limit lawsuits to whether the project is
consistent with growth plans
Supporters of the environmental act point to numerous "success
stories:"
• In 1996, the Roman Catholic
Archdiocese of Los Angeles abandoned plans to tear down St.
Vibiana's Cathedral after courts forced further environmental
studies. The archdiocese eventually sold the property to a developer
who began a seismic retrofit of the building.
• In 2002, the Antioch City
Council shelved a 2,700-acre residential-commercial project when the
environmental impact report showed it would add 14,000 more car
trips to Highway 4.
• In 2003, Hercules developers
planning a 123-home project on an old industrial site agreed to more
extensive soil sampling tests after newly required environmental
studies raised concerns about toxic soils.
• In 2003, Lockheed Martin
dropped plans for 18,000 homes and two golf courses in Riverside
County's Portrero Valley after a Sierra Club lawsuit proved its
environmental impact report inadequate. The land eventually became
part of the San Jacinto Wildlife Area.
• In
2003, Dow Chemical
agreed to 30
measures to
reduce emissions
from a proposed
pesticide manufacturing
plant in Pittsburg,
and agreed to
donate $1 million
for environmental
projects after
a lawsuit challenged
the city's approval
of the plant
without environmental
studies.
Sources:
California
Building Industry
Association;
attorneys
for Castle and
Cooke, Inc.;
Planning and
Conservation
League; California
League of
Conservation
Voters.
|